Page 1 of 2

3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 11:56 am
by DerekLegg
Can somebody please enlighten me. If video shot on a 3 CCD camcorder is played back on a single CCD camcorder does it degrade the quality of the footage?

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:36 pm
by JPaul
No, it shouldn't because the playback just reads/processes the digital encoding. I'm assuming a clean read, good tracking of course.

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 2:49 pm
by BobNaughton
Derek, for my 2 cents worth, I would agree with Paul in the previous post. A 3 CCD chip camera would get a better image due to it being a 3CCD chips as well as most likely having a better optical lens. Once the camera has processsed that optical image and turned it into its little digital bits, a regular 1 CCD ought to be able to download that superior digital image into your unit without degrading the quality.

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:01 pm
by TimKennelly
The 3 and 1 CCD chip portion is strictly for acquisition (taking the shot) and has nothing inherent to do with playback.

That said, the 3 chippers are usually higher quality cams and so are likely to have higher quality parts (heads, etc) than the 1 chippers, but it is very unlikely with the multiple error correction circuitry in both types of cams to make a difference in digital playback which is what you would be doing either way.

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:17 am
by DerekLegg
My thanks to you all for the answers. What a great place this bulletin board is. The reason I asked the question is that having recently aquired a 3 CCD camcorder I can now use my previous camcorder to rewind and transfer footage, thus saving wear on the new camera.

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:08 am
by JPaul
It's smart to use the cheaper cam for what you describe and should work well. If you do notice dropouts, then you may have to use the cam that took the footage to download. Otherwise, you should be good to go!

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:32 am
by Beachy
Just a mention about using "Old Gear" I have used my old Semi Pro SVHS camera straight into the Avio and had wonderful results! I have only done this at school plays etc but the pictures were great, much better than if I had used a SVHS tape...and its only a one chip camera..albeit a S VHS.. but good enough for a third camera at the back of the Hall...B

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 7:17 am
by chetdavis
Also, want to throw in the thought or consideration that there is a difference in performance between CCD and the newer CMOS chips. Both of these are the solid state imaging devices in contemporary camcorders. There are certainly plenty of articles and citations on the 'net as well as personal recommendatins from members on this Forum for those who wish to know more about this -- but I can say the perfomance of my single chip CMOS HDV camera totally blows my (old, trusty, beloeved) 3-chip TRV-900 out of the water -- _but_ that is only said in good lighting situations.

So - perhaps for those consideing a new camcorder - this thread could read: 3 imaging devices vs 1 and CMOS vs CCD.

Regards,
Chet

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:32 am
by Beachy
Chet, What does CMOS stand for? And are CMOS Chips better than
English, Fish'n'Chips :D John

Re: 3 CCD versus 1 CCD

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:59 am
by chetdavis
Beachy,

Since you asked CMOS = Complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor. (honestly I had to look that one up)... although I did/do know that CCD=Charge Coupled Device. Now that bit of knowledge and a buck will get you a cup of coffee somewhere :D

By the way, neither CCD or CMOS is better than English Fish n' Chips!

Regards,
Chet