16 x 9 Anamorphic Lens and our Systems
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:49 am
Hey Guys,
Hope all are doing well. Say, has anyone had experience (or are you using) a 16 x 9 anamorphic lens?
I see we have a setting on our units for anamorphic 16 x 9; does that work? Also, with that setting, will that still leave an image with black borders on the top and bottom of a screen as well as thinner side borders - when viewed on a typical widescreen TV?
Finally, would a burned DVD of something shot and edited 16 x 9 anamorphic, would that look "normal" even if played back on a 4:3 TV? With borders in this case, fine, but would the image be squeezed or stretched, etc.?
I'm getting a few mixed opinions, some saying the image will still have to be stretched in order to truly fit one's widescreen TV. I have Sony VX2000s and am tossing around the idea of getting one of these (or a couple) to shoot widescreen with; the trade-off of course is I will lose a bit on my zoom abilities.
Any feedback, pros, cons, etc. would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
John
Hope all are doing well. Say, has anyone had experience (or are you using) a 16 x 9 anamorphic lens?
I see we have a setting on our units for anamorphic 16 x 9; does that work? Also, with that setting, will that still leave an image with black borders on the top and bottom of a screen as well as thinner side borders - when viewed on a typical widescreen TV?
Finally, would a burned DVD of something shot and edited 16 x 9 anamorphic, would that look "normal" even if played back on a 4:3 TV? With borders in this case, fine, but would the image be squeezed or stretched, etc.?
I'm getting a few mixed opinions, some saying the image will still have to be stretched in order to truly fit one's widescreen TV. I have Sony VX2000s and am tossing around the idea of getting one of these (or a couple) to shoot widescreen with; the trade-off of course is I will lose a bit on my zoom abilities.
Any feedback, pros, cons, etc. would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
John