DVI vs. HDMI high def monitor connectors
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:17 am
Greetings,
There was a question from a customer on the Cassie Tips List Serve this weekend - asking why we selected DVI instead of HDMI for monitoring the HD signal on our new products - I know some members here may have that same question... here is a the answer directly from Macrosystem DE CEO Jörg Sprave:
Most monitors these days have HDMI - why would Macrosystem use DVI?
Are there any sync issues due to running a separate audio out of the s-4000 to the monitor, and using DVI for video?
There was a question from a customer on the Cassie Tips List Serve this weekend - asking why we selected DVI instead of HDMI for monitoring the HD signal on our new products - I know some members here may have that same question... here is a the answer directly from Macrosystem DE CEO Jörg Sprave:
Most monitors these days have HDMI - why would Macrosystem use DVI?
Are there any sync issues due to running a separate audio out of the s-4000 to the monitor, and using DVI for video?
Here are some of the reasons that made us using DVI instead of HDMI:
- DVI is much more solid, with real screws fixing the cable in place, HDMI is a cheap consumer grade connector
- Most of our customers are not using the built-on monitor speakers of the TV set, but more professional audio amp/speaker combinations instead
- HDMI-TVs have external audio in for the HDMI anyway, for those who want to use the built in speakers
- HDMI is very costly (royalties), DVI is free
- There is the painful issue of the HDCP copy protection on the HDMI, which often creates compatibility issues between the unit and the TV set
All in all, DVI is robust, inexpensive, compatible, and free of copy protection complications.
And there are no known sync issues!
Regards
Jörg Sprave